American Bar Association Says UN Arms Treaty Consistent With 2nd Amendment

“Though the amendment protects “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,” it does not protect the right to supply arms to persons who are not themselves among “the people” of the United States.”
Photo/Oxfam International

Photo/Oxfam International

UNITED NATIONS (TRNS) – A proposed U.N. treaty to regulate international arms sales would likely have no impact on U.S. domestic gun laws, according to a white paper released by the American Bar Association earlier this week.

The report by the ABA’s Center for Human Rights, which comes less than three weeks before U.N. members states are set to resume negotiations on the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT), seemingly weakens claims by the National Rifle Association and other groups that the treaty poses a great risk to Second Amendment rights.

The Obama administration backed away from the ATT negotiation conference last summer after the American gun lobby and members of the US Senate and Congress alleged the deal threatened private ownership of firearms for American citizens.

But the American Bar Association’s latest analysis of the ATT concludes that while the treaty would impose obligations on the U.S. government to block international arm transfers to suspected human rights abusers, war criminals, and terrorists, it “would not require new domestic regulations of firearms.”

“If the United States signs and ratifies the ATT, in its most recent iteration in the President’s text of 26 July 2012, the United States retains the discretion to regulate the flow of weapons into and out of the United States in a manner consistent with the Second Amendment,” reads the white paper.

The ABA report also found that the majority of weapons covered by the Arms Trade Treaty do not enjoy Second Amendment protections, citing the Supreme Court decision in District of Columbia v. Heller, that “the Second Amendment applies only to firearms that are ‘typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes,’ but not to ‘dangerous and unusual weapons.”

It says the current version of the agreement would cover the international transfers of all conventional weapons, including tanks, armored vehicles, attack helicopters, combat aircrafts, artillery systems, and missile launchers, as well as small arms and light weapons.

The National Riffle Association has energetically lobbied against the inclusion of small arms and light weapons in the ATT, blasting treaty negotiators for targeting  “civilians weapons” it says are protected by the U.S. constitution.

However, the ABA white paper notes that District of Columbia v. Heller does not extend Second Amendment protections to “small arms and light weapons” such as short barreled shotguns, machine-guns, and automatic M-16 rifles.

It says that even though constitutional protections apply to some weapons classified as “small arms and light weapons,” the Second Amendment does not cover activities like importing and exporting arms.

“The Second Amendment is generally inapplicable to arms exports. Though the amendment protects “the right of the people to keep and bear Arms,” it does not protect the right to supply arms to persons who are not themselves among “the people” of the United States,” says the ABA report.

But conservative groups and gun rights activists remain unconvinced, and maintain that possible future amendments to the ATT might eventually infringe on American gun laws.

Dr. Ted Bromund, a Senior Research Fellow at the Heritage Foundation and outspoken critic of the Arms Trade Treaty, says the American Bar Association’s white paper fails to consider the longterm implications of the agreement.

“What the ABA has missed is that although the ATT is a treaty, it is fundamentally a process. It is going to be a treaty with annual conferences, a secretariat for annual implementation,” Bromund told TRNS. “This is a treaty regime. What you see is going to be changed and added to by new interpretations of international law. By accepting the treaty, the US is entering into that process… That’s why I think this kind of thing is liable eventually to lead into second amendment concerns.”

The ABA report, however, says the current ATT draft ensures countries have the ability to address any future changes to the treaty “within the bounds of their own constitutional requirements.”

But the Heritage Foundation’s Bromund argues the ATT’s shortcomings go well beyond Second Amendment concerns.

While groups like Amnesty International and OXFAM have emphasized the importance of the ATT as an international mechanism to stem the flow of weapons to human rights abusers, Bromund says such expectations are far too optimistic given the powerful U.N. Security Council’s own struggles to implement arms embargoes.

“A treaty is the wrong mechanism to fix this because it assumes that more laws are going to stop illegal activity,” he told TRNS. “The ATT is going to cover the entire world and every country’s arms transactions. You have to be crazy to think that’s going to be easier to enforce than the arms embargoes.”

The Arms Trade Treaty negotiations conference is set to resume at the U.N. headquarters in New York March 18-28th.

 

TRNS UN Bureau Footer

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

TRNS UN Desk
News updates from inside the headquarters of the United Nations.
  • Bearteacher

    Lets see this is the ABA who has never met a gun control law it didnt like and never until forced to by the SCOTUS recognized the individual rights sector of the 2nd Amendment.  even then they try the usual progressive liberal statist arguement that it doesnt protect 100 year old technology widely used in firearms.  The real threat from the arms treaty is this requirement that countries maintain some type of registry and restrict the types of firearms that ordinary citizens can own.  Kind of sounds like the current debate on small arms in the U.S.  Besides does anyone really think that our own government or any government when push comes to shove will ignore the treaty.  The Arms Import/Export Control Act of 1975 needs to be amended to allow the return of U.S. made sall arms and ammo to the U.S.for sale to U.S. citizens if they were bought and not acquired through MAP etc.  Usual uninformed feel good garbage.

  • steve holvik

    Just the fact that it is a U.N. arms treaty makes is inconsistent with our Bill of Rights…duh. I also like the open ended wording.  “A proposed U.N. treaty to regulate international arms sales would LIKELY have no impact on U.S. domestic gun laws”. “The ABA report also found that the MAJORITY of weapons covered by the
    Arms Trade Treaty do not enjoy Second Amendment protections”. What about guns manufactured in other countries that we frequently purchase here….or the ammunition? Just stop the FED from walking guns into Mexico to start with, then come talk to me about arms treaties…

  • http://churchofsmoke.org/ Jose

    The ABA should pick up a copy of Blacks Law Dictionary and try to understand what “shall not infringe” means.
     

  • Anerican Patriot

    How much do you want to bet that the Clinton Global Initiative is driving this? Anyone have any idea what happens to a countries populace when gun control is instituted? Ever hear about genocide?

  • American Patriot

    How much do you want to bet that the Clinton Global Initiative is
    driving this? Anyone have any idea what happens to a countries populace
    when gun control is instituted? Ever hear about genocide?

  • Mgh999

    SCOTUS confirmed “Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those ‘in common use at the time’ finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons. That seems a bit different than “the Second Amendment applies only to firearms that are ‘typically possessed by law-abiding citizens for lawful purposes,’ Very similar, but different.

    But then again when has the UN ever done anything worthwhile? Under their guise of one country, one vote it’s incredibly easy for dictatorial, oppressive members to band together and outvote freedom and democracy. Heck half the votes are just excuses to extort money from the US through various joint tariffs, and funds.

Obama Signs Bill Banning Iranian Diplomat From U.S.

Hamid Abutalebi was involved in the 1979 hostage crisis in Iran where Americans were held for more than a year.

Homs, Syria A “Theatre Of Death And Destruction”: UN Envoy

Recent fighting in the city has cut its residents off from urgent deliveries of humanitarian aid, the opposition Syrian National Coalition said.

Crimea Will Be Ours Again: Ukraine PM

Arseniy Yatsenyuk said Ukraine is ready to fight to hold onto the annexed region, but will concentrate on working with the international community.

Review On Keystone Pipeline Delayed, Again

The delayed review of the pipeline now likely takes the issue off the table for the upcoming November elections.

White House: Antisemitic Flyers Disturbing, But Origins Unclear

White House Press Secretary Jay Carney on Friday told TRNS he wasn’t sure who was behind antisemitic flyers in eastern Ukraine.

Experts: Despite Little Progress, ‘Pivot To Asia’ Not Yet Dead

Senior Administration Officials

A talk hosted by The Brookings Institution looked at how the Obama administration can still make it’s ‘pivot to Asia’ work despite lost time.