Liberal Group Says Obama’s Courting Corruption

The watchdog group Common Cause wants more disclosure from the president's former campaign, which is now working to advance his second-term agenda.

Obama SOTU 2013 B

The liberal watchdog organization Common Cause is blasting President Obama for agreeing to headline a conference being held by his former campaign-turned advocacy group, Organizing For Action.

Obama will speak tonight at an OFA dinner in downtown D.C., where wealthy donors who paid top dollar will be in attendance.

The White House says there’s really no difference between OFA and other political fundraising groups like the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee or the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. But Common Cause President Bob Edgar disagrees:

“Those groups are all highly regulated as partisan political organizations,” he said in a statement today. “OFA is designed to avoid the disclosure and contribution regulations that those groups have in order to prevent corruption.”

Obama came under fire last week after The New York Times reported that OFA had promised meetings with the president to donors who contribute $50,000 or more to the group.

“Political parties aren’t allowed to accept $50,000 from a single donor, and Organizing for Action shouldn’t either,” Edgar said.

Obama’s chief spokesman, Jay Carney, knocked down that report, insisting that access to Obama is simply not for sale.

Back in 1972, Common Cause sued former President Richard Nixon’s (R) Committee to Re-Elect the President over its failure to disclose the identity of its donors. Now, Edgar wants OFA to do the same.

“Organizing for Action has promised to disclose its donors on a quarterly basis, but that is not enough,” Edgar said. “Whether it’s Nixon selling ambassador posts, Clinton selling a night in the Lincoln Bedroom, or Bush selling black-tie dinners at the White House, selling access to the Presidency is just plain wrong and courts corruption. President Obama should put an end to this unsavory practice, not perpetuate it.”

The president’s prepared remarks tonight will be open to a handful of pooled reporters, but a likely question-and-answer session to follow will be closed to the press.

Geoff Holtzman
Geoff Holtzman is Talk Radio News Service's Deputy Bureau Chief. As one of TRNS's primary correspondents, he helps cover the White House and Capitol Hill. Geoff also covered the 2012 presidential campaign, following the candidates to Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina, North Carolina, Florida and elsewhere. In the process, he learned that not all Motel 6's are created equal. Follow Geoff on Twitter @Geoff_Holtzman.

One Response to “Liberal Group Says Obama’s Courting Corruption” Subscribe

  1. pupsncats March 15, 2013 at 4:16 pm #

    Everything Obama does is corrupt so this shouldn’t be a surprise. Everything he says is a lie or a half truth.

Leave a Reply

Pentgon Announces Laboratory Review After 9 Live Anthrax Shipments

The Department is also working with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in their investigation of the shipments.

The World in 2:00 – May 29, 2015

The World in 2:00 continents logo

The founder of the Silk Road is sentenced to life in prison, and an American firm helps bridge a major gap in the delivery of humanitarian aid.

Report: Hastert Paid Individual to Conceal “Sexual Misconduct”

The Los Angeles Times reports that an, “official confirmed that the misconduct involved sexual abuse.”

Defense Secretary Joins Facebook

Carter is the first Defense chief to join Facebook.

‘Freedom of Speech Rally Round II’ Scheduled Near Phoenix Mosque

The anti-Islam rally is encouraging participants to come with weapons and draw negative images of the Prophet Muhammad, like the original event that resulted in a gun fight

NYT Editorial Board: Let The Patriot Act Expire

NSA

“The looming expiration of a handful of provisions of the Patriot Act, which gave federal authorities vast surveillance powers, has stirred a long-overdue debate over the proper balance between investigative tactics in national security cases and civil liberties,” the editorial board wrote.